Archives for category: toefl

Test Test Date Reading Listening Speaking Writing Total
TELXML March 29, 2008 30 29 23 28 110
How to interpret scores?
 
Reading  Skills Level   Your Performance  
Reading High(22-30) Test takers who receive a score at the HIGH level, as you did, typically understand academic texts in English that require a wide range of reading abilities regardless of the difficulty of the texts.Test takers who score at the HIGH level, typically

  • have a very good command of academic vocabulary and grammatical structure;
  • can understand and connect information, make appropriate inferences, and synthesize ideas, even when the text is conceptually dense and the language is complex;
  • can recognize the expository organization of a text and the role that specific information serves within the larger text, even when the text is conceptually dense; and
  • can abstract major ideas from a text, even when the text is conceptually dense and contains complex language.
Listening  Skills Level   Your Performance  
Listening High(22-30) Test takers who receive a score at the HIGH level, as you did, typically understand conversations and lectures in English that present a wide range of listening demands. These demands can include difficult vocabulary (uncommon terms, or colloquial or figurative language), complex grammatical structures, abstract or complex ideas, and/or making sense of unexpected or seemingly contradictory information.When listening to lectures and conversations like these, test takers at the HIGH level typically can

  • understand main ideas and important details, whether they are stated or implied;
  • distinguish more important ideas from less important ones;
  • understand how information is being used (for example, to provide evidence for a claim or describe a step in a complex process);
  • recognize how pieces of information are connected (for example, in a cause-and-effect relationship);
  • understand many different ways that speakers use language for purposes other than to give information (for example, to emphasize a point, express agreement or disagreement, or convey intentions indirectly); and
  • synthesize information, even when it is not presented in sequence, and make correct inferences on the basis of that information.
Speaking  Skills Level   Your Performance  
Speaking about familiar topics Fair(2.5 – 3.0) Your responses indicate you are able to speak in English about your personal experiences and opinions in a mostly clear and coherent manner. Your speech is mostly clear with only occasional errors. Grammar and vocabulary are somewhat limited and include some errors. At times, the limitations prevent you from elaborating fully on your ideas, but they do not seriously interfere with overall communication.
Speaking about campus situations Fair(2.5 – 3.0) Your responses demonstrate an ability to speak in English about reading material and experiences typically encountered by university students. You are able to convey relevant information about conversations, newspaper articles, and campus bulletins; however, some details are missing or inaccurate. Limitations of grammar, vocabulary, and pronunciation at times cause difficulty for the listener. However, they do not seriously interfere with overall communication.
Speaking about academic course content Good(3.5 – 4.0) Your responses demonstrate an ability to communicate effectively in English about academic topics typical of first-year university studies. Your speech is mostly clear and fluent. You are able to use appropriate vocabulary and grammar to explain concepts and ideas from reading or lecture material. You are able to talk about key information and relevant details with only minor inaccuracies.
Writing  Skills Level   Your Performance  
Writing based on reading and listening Good(4.0 – 5.0) You responded well to the task, relating the lecture to the reading. Weaknesses, if you have any, might have to do with

  • slight imprecision in your summary of some of the main points and/or
  • use of English that is occasionally ungrammatical or unclear.
Writing based on knowledge and experience Good(4.0 – 5.0) You responded with a well-organized and developed essay. Weaknesses, if you have any, might have to do with

  • use of English that is occasionally ungrammatical, unclear, or unidiomatic and/or
  • elaboration of ideas or connection of ideas that could have been stronger.

写了阅读和听力的机经,挺全的(自豪),同志们有兴趣可以参考一下,都有近1000字吧

口语第一题基本砸了,其他都还好。

阅读比所有模拟题都难很多。听力很简单。口语也不难(如果我第一题没有搞砸的话应该可以过25)。综合作文3个点工工整整列出来,很好写,不过我写出来的联系可能不够强。大概215字。独立作文,写了415个字,留了时间检查,发挥比平时练习好很多。

其他的信息将会陆续在toefl专栏那里更新…诸如考场诀窍、复习策略、复习材料选择等等~等一下回珠海了~晚上再写。

开始G。大三下学期开始前考完作文,6月再把笔考考了。

大三争取混一篇有分量Paper。这样年末就可以开始寄申请了。

平行准备二战托福。目标110+。

开始好好学习。

最重要的,多看书,多看好书,不然很容易脑残的。

短期内:

还没出哪!

中期:

(more…)